Grounded mode · always cited
A copilot that would rather say “I can’t find that” than guess.
Generic AI invents citations and hallucinates thresholds — a liability in a regulated deliverable. This copilot only answers from your evidence and the installed knowledge packs, and every claim it makes carries a link to its source. When the record doesn’t support an answer, it tells you, and shows you the gap.
GCopilot · Willow Creek Restoration · 4 packs installed
What compensatory mitigation ratio applies to the riparian impacts, and is it cited?
G
↳ searched: Biological Assessment, CEQA pack, CDFW LSA guidance
A minimum 2:1 replacement ratio applies to permanent riparian habitat impacts, per the project’s adopted Habitat Mitigation & Monitoring Plan1 and consistent with CDFW’s Lake or Streambed Alteration program under Fish & Game Code § 16022. The BA quantifies 1.8 acres of permanent impact3, implying ≥ 3.6 acres of compensatory restoration.
1HMMP · Table 22CEQA pack · § 16023Bio Assessment · p. 41
And the GHG significance threshold for the county?
G
I can’t answer that from the record. No Air Quality / GHG analysis is attached to this project, and no installed pack defines a Ventura County GHG threshold. I won’t estimate one — it would be uncited.
Gap logged → Risk & ComplianceSuggest: install Air Quality & GHG pack
Ask about this project’s evidence…grounded
Drafts from evidence
Generates sections, comment responses, and memos built only from your record — cited as it writes.
Checks against frameworks
Runs a draft against the governing pack and flags what’s missing, unsupported, or out of date.
Refuses to hallucinate
No source, no answer. Gaps are surfaced and logged, never papered over with a confident guess.
Every claim traceable
Click any citation to land on the exact page, table, or statute it came from.
Generic AI
- ✕Invents plausible citations
- ✕States thresholds it can’t source
- ✕No link between claim and evidence
- ✕Confident when it should be uncertain
Grocky Copilot
- ✓Answers only from your record + packs
- ✓Cites every claim to its source
- ✓Refuses — and logs the gap — when unsupported
- ✓Audited, grounded, review-ready